Iturralde V Hilo Medical Center Usa Summary - Medical Center Information

Disidencia Sin Animo de Lucro CMM (Nuestro granito de arena) Venta de

Iturralde V Hilo Medical Center Usa Summary - Medical Center Information. Ricketson, on january 24, 2001, for assessment of increasing weakness in his legs that resulted in several falls. Case summary a medical malpractice case involving rosalinda iturralde as the plaintiff, the sibling, and representative of the estate for the late arturo iturralde.

Disidencia Sin Animo de Lucro CMM (Nuestro granito de arena) Venta de
Disidencia Sin Animo de Lucro CMM (Nuestro granito de arena) Venta de

Robert ricketson, was held responsible for his behavior during his care of arturo iturralde. Hilo medical center, usa is a case that was decided on march 30, 2012 by the intermediate court of appeals of hawaii. Robert ricketson, misplaced the two titanium rods needed for iturralde's spine. On january 24, 2001, arthur iturralde went to the hospital for severe, debilitating back pain. Hilo medical center, usa is a case that was decided on march 30, 2012 by the intermediate court of appeals of hawaii. Iturralde’s family was granted some money ($5.6 million and $3.4 million) by the accused as compensation following the doctor’s malpractice. The surgeon was found 65 % negligent and liable in arturo’s death and hilo medical center usa was held liable for 35%. The intermediate court of appeal made a decision in favor of the litigant, a. Ricketson while the remainder 35% was incurred by hilo medical center. This was in january 2001 when.

Ricketson’s had his license suspended apart from being denied a practicing license by other states. He was scheduled for surgery several days later, on january 29, 2001 with dr. Ricketson’s had his license suspended apart from being denied a practicing license by other states. Summarize the selected case, including information on the stakeholders involved, the problem, and the time period the incident occurred. Hilo medical center (hmc), medtronic sofamor danek, usa, and robert ricketson, m., are the defendants in. The surgeon was found 65 % negligent and liable in arturo’s death and hilo medical center usa was held liable for 35%. This was in january 2001 when. Arturo iturralde need a spinal fusion surgery, which involved implanting two rods into the spine to form a bilateral fixation, at the hilo medical center. Robert ricketson, misplaced the two titanium rods needed for iturralde's spine. Using this analysis of the case, you will address the facts pertaining to the medical standard of care, breach of care, and causation. Ricketson, on january 24, 2001, for assessment of increasing weakness in his legs that resulted in several falls.